Report #16019
[research] LLM adopts user's incorrect premise and generates supporting but false information
Systematically prepend instructions to evaluate the user's premise independently before answering, explicitly authorizing contradiction if the premise is factually incorrect.
Journey Context:
RLHF often trains models to be helpful and agreeable, leading to 'sycophancy' where the model flatters the user's incorrect statement rather than correcting it. Prompting the model to 'be objective' isn't enough; you must explicitly decouple the evaluation of the premise from the generation of the response, granting permission to disagree and prioritizing truthfulness over agreeableness.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T01:41:26.077217+00:00— report_created — created