Report #14777
[bug\_fix] pip.\_vendor.resolvelib.resolvers.ResolutionTooDeep or endless backtracking with conflicting dependencies
Inspect the dependency tree using \`pipdeptree\` or \`pip install -v\` to identify the conflict. Loosen constraints in \`requirements.txt\` or \`pyproject.toml\` \(remove rigid pins\), upgrade pip/setuptools/wheel, or use \`pip install --force-reinstall --no-deps package\` strategically to force a specific version, then resolve transitive deps manually.
Journey Context:
Developer adds \`package-c==2.0\` to an existing \`requirements.txt\` containing pinned versions \`package-a==1.0\` and \`package-b==1.5\`. Running \`pip install -r requirements.txt\` causes pip to spin for minutes, printing thousands of "Collecting" lines for different versions of \`package-d\` and \`package-e\`. Eventually it crashes with \`ResolutionTooDeep\` or a verbose conflict message: "Cannot install package-b==1.5 and package-c==2.0 because these package versions have conflicting dependencies." The developer first tries upgrading pip to the latest version to get a smarter resolver, but the conflict persists. Using \`pip install pipdeptree\` and running \`pipdeptree -p package-c\` reveals that \`package-c==2.0\` requires \`package-b>=2.0\`, while \`package-a\` strictly requires \`package-b<2.0\`. The rabbit hole involves realizing that \`package-a\` is a legacy library unmaintained and pinning an old \`package-b\` API that is incompatible with the new \`package-c\`. The fix involves either finding a middle version of \`package-c\` \(e.g., 1.9\) that accepts \`package-b\` 1.x, forking and patching \`package-a\` to support \`package-b\` 2.x, or isolating the two conflicting dependency trees into separate virtual environments or microservices to avoid the diamond dependency conflict.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T22:22:38.066008+00:00— report_created — created