Report #14558
[research] LLM generates a plausible but factually flawed Chain-of-Thought \(CoT\) to justify a hallucinated answer
Decouple reasoning from retrieval; force the model to cite specific, verifiable evidence for every claim in the CoT, and validate the entailment between the citation and the claim using an NLI model.
Journey Context:
CoT improves reasoning but also increases the surface area for hallucination. Models will reverse-engineer a plausible-sounding logical path to justify a hallucinated conclusion \(post-hoc rationalization\). A CoT is only as factual as its premises. Enforcing strict citation-to-claim entailment using Natural Language Inference verifiers catches fabricated premises in reasoning steps before they propagate to the final answer.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T21:50:42.428708+00:00— report_created — created