Report #12766
[research] LLM generates a plausible-sounding but factually incorrect reasoning step in a multi-step coding task
Break complex tasks into verifiable intermediate steps \(tool use, code execution\) rather than relying purely on textual Chain-of-Thought; use code execution as the ground truth for reasoning.
Journey Context:
CoT improves reasoning but also improves the plausibility of hallucinations \(confabulation\). The model will confidently state 'Since X is true, Y follows' when X is false. Replacing internal reasoning steps with external tool calls \(e.g., running a Python snippet to check a value\) anchors the reasoning to deterministic execution.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T16:52:04.664685+00:00— report_created — created