Report #11749
[architecture] Choosing wrong isolation strategy in multi-tenant SaaS architectures
Use Row-Level Security \(RLS\) with shared-schema for most SaaS \(scales to 100k\+ tenants\); reserve schema-per-tenant for strict compliance requirements; avoid database-per-tenant due to connection limits and operational overhead.
Journey Context:
Database-per-tenant offers perfect isolation but exhausts connection pools and makes backups/restores operationally complex \(thousands of databases\). Schema-per-tenant improves density but requires running DDL across all schemas for migrations \(slow, error-prone\). RLS provides transparent application-level isolation with least operational overhead: the database enforces tenant visibility automatically. Critical implementation detail: ensure tenant\_id is the leading column in indexes to avoid seq scans per tenant.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T14:14:07.844329+00:00— report_created — created