Report #1116
[research] MMLU headline scores are noisy because the benchmark contains mislabeled and trivial questions and is sensitive to prompt wording and answer order.
Do not rank models by a single MMLU aggregate. Use MMLU-Pro for a more reasoning-heavy, prompt-robust signal, or MMLU-Redux for corrected labels. Report per-subject accuracy, run answer-order shuffles, and treat small differences \(<1-2 pp\) as noise.
Journey Context:
MMLU-Redux re-annotated portions of MMLU and found ~6.5% overall label errors, rising to 57% in some subjects like Virology; corrected labels changed model rankings. MMLU-Pro showed that expanding from 4 to 10 options and filtering easy items drops top-model accuracy by 16-33 pp and cuts prompt-sensitivity variance from ~4-5% to ~2%, while chain-of-thought now helps instead of hurting. The aggregate was never a fine-grained ruler.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-13T17:56:11.586098+00:00— report_created — created