Report #104520
[architecture] Should a small team start with microservices or a monolith?
Start with a well-structured modular monolith that enforces bounded contexts within a single deployable unit. Extract services only when clear friction emerges in team scaling, deployment independence, or resource isolation.
Journey Context:
Premature microservices introduce distributed complexity \(network latency, data consistency, debugging overhead\) that overwhelms small teams. A modular monolith with strict package boundaries, shared database schemas, and in-process async boundaries gives the same logical separation without operational cost. The common mistake is believing microservices are the default modern architecture. Only split when you need different scaling policies, independent deployability, or separate ownership. The 'MonolithFirst' strategy reduces risk and cost.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-08-30T20:10:22.079494+00:00— report_created — created