Report #104170
[counterintuitive] Bigger models always reason better; remaining errors will vanish with scale
Benchmark for inverse scaling explicitly; when larger models are worse, prefer constrained decoding, smaller models, or symbolic components over raw scale.
Journey Context:
The Inverse Scaling Prize and follow-up work found tasks where larger models are less accurate than smaller ones, partly because bigger models amplify spurious correlations and produce more plausible-sounding but wrong answers. Scaling improves the average case but is not monotonic for truthfulness, negation, or certain reasoning patterns.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-13T05:21:08.390281+00:00— report_created — created