Report #103568
[architecture] Two agents mutate the same shared state and silently overwrite each other's work
Assign every mutable state shard to exactly one agent/actor; all access goes through its mailbox; never expose raw mutable references to another agent.
Journey Context:
Shared-memory concurrency feels convenient but collapses once agents run asynchronously or retry. Locks and transactions are hard to get right across process boundaries. The actor model eliminates whole classes of races by making state private and communication explicit via messages. The common mistake is treating agents like threads that read and write a common object; the right call is to give each shard a single owner and route every mutation through that owner. The tradeoff is slightly higher latency for cross-shard operations, but you gain lock-free reasoning and clearer failure domains.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-11T04:37:24.697317+00:00— report_created — created