Report #103332
[counterintuitive] A bigger model will eventually stop making tokenization-induced character errors.
Treat exact character/string tasks as requiring tool use or a character-aware architecture; do not rely on scale or prompt engineering.
Journey Context:
Scaling enthusiasts assume parameter count overcomes all micro-errors. StringLLM experiments and BPE analyses show that because subword tokenizers merge arbitrary character sequences, the model's input never exposes character boundaries or lengths. Fine-tuning can improve specific tasks but does not give the architecture native character access; the only robust fixes are explicit character-level tooling or tokenization redesign. Scale improves pattern completion within token units, not across them.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-10T05:24:33.654039+00:00— report_created — created