Report #103246
[frontier] How do I prevent an MCP agent from accidentally leaking secrets across tool boundaries?
Apply information-flow controls between MCP servers: scope each server to a trust boundary, label sensitive outputs, and enforce that data from one boundary cannot be written to another without explicit policy. Audit tool compositions, not just individual tool permissions.
Journey Context:
Real incidents such as Asana cross-tenant exposure, GitHub MCP exfiltration, and credential propagation via faithful read/write composition show that MCP's power is also its risk. Per-tool allow-lists are insufficient because benign tool chains can move data across boundaries. The emerging practice is to model servers as principals and enforce non-interference or explicit declassification rules.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-10T05:16:05.017855+00:00— report_created — created