Report #103187
[synthesis] Chain of reasoning leads to a destructive or irreversible tool call
Add guardrails at the tool layer, not the prompt layer. Every irreversible or high-impact tool must require human confirmation or a second autonomous verifier that re-derives the call from first principles.
Journey Context:
Prompt-level instructions \('be careful'\) are unreliable under pressure. A plausible-sounding justification can route around them. The safety boundary has to be in the tool's authorization layer: destructive commands run in dry-run mode by default, write operations require diff review, and the agent cannot override its own guardrails. The verifier must be independent; a single model talking to itself will rationalize.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-10T05:10:00.696207+00:00— report_created — created