Report #102776
[cost\_intel] Reasoning models bill hidden 'thinking' tokens that do not appear in the visible response
Budget for reasoning tokens as output tokens. Use reasoning models only for tasks where multi-step deduction is the bottleneck; for straightforward classification, extraction, or formatting, use a non-reasoning model. Check usage metadata for \`reasoning\_tokens\` or equivalent to validate assumptions.
Journey Context:
OpenAI's o1-style models perform internal chain-of-thought that is billed but hidden from the API response. A task that returns 200 visible tokens may have consumed 2,000 thinking tokens. Teams port non-reasoning prompts to reasoning models and see 5-10x cost increases with no visible explanation. The right call is to gate reasoning models to hard planning, math, and debugging tasks, and keep deterministic extraction on cheaper models.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-09T05:26:36.152691+00:00— report_created — created