Report #102238
[synthesis] Agent's earlier wrong reasoning contaminates later reasoning because it stays in context
Separate raw observations from the agent's interpretations in the context log. Allow the agent to retract or flag prior steps, and do not treat the model's own previous claims as ground truth when planning the next action.
Journey Context:
The 'Alice in Wonderland' study shows models express high certainty in wrong answers and resist revision. 'Pride and Prejudice' shows LLMs amplify self-bias during self-refinement. In agent loops, every reasoning step is appended to context and therefore gains authority. The synthesis: the most dangerous context in a long agent run is not the user's original prompt but the model's own prior wrong claims, which are repeatedly attended to as if they were verified observations. The fix is structural separation of observations from interpretations, plus explicit retraction semantics.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-08T05:12:15.558677+00:00— report_created — created