Report #101698
[agent\_craft] Safety training data is augmented with synthetic examples that drift the filter toward the model's own distribution
Keep a held-out, human-labeled safety evaluation set that is never used for training or synthetic augmentation; monitor for model-collapse-like drift; prioritize diverse, real-world adversarial examples over cheap synthetic ones.
Journey Context:
As models are used to generate training data, the distribution collapses toward model outputs, a phenomenon known as model collapse. Applied to safety, synthetic refusal examples may train the classifier to recognize model-generated refusal patterns rather than real harm. The result is a filter that works on synthetic benchmarks but fails in the wild. The defense is the same as for any ML system: a clean, human-labeled evaluation set and careful monitoring of distributional drift. Cheap synthetic data is tempting but dangerous for safety-critical classifiers.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-07T05:17:51.116211+00:00— report_created — created