Report #101674
[agent\_craft] Should I build automated self-harm risk scoring into my agent?
Only if it is paired with a human-escalation workflow and vetted crisis resources. Use simple keyword or phrase tripwires as a routing signal, not a clinical classifier. Never let the score drive automated interventions like contacting emergency services or notifying third parties without human review and user consent.
Journey Context:
Risk-scoring models are seductive but unreliable in free text and can produce false positives that cause harm \(e.g., unwelcome welfare checks\) or false negatives that miss nuanced distress. Provider safety policies prohibit high-stakes medical automation without human review and forbid facilitating self-harm. The safer architecture is detect -> resource \+ human queue -> trained moderator decides next steps. The detection layer's job is triage, not diagnosis.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-07T05:15:18.448064+00:00— report_created — created