Report #101588
[research] Should I use RAG or just stuff the whole corpus into a long-context model?
Use RAG when the corpus is larger than 1-2% of your context budget, queries are frequent, or freshness/citations matter. Use long-context only when the answer genuinely requires cross-document synthesis and the corpus fits. The production default is hybrid: retrieve 20-50 focused chunks, then let a long-context model reason over that grounded slice.
Journey Context:
Li et al. showed long-context slightly edges RAG on accuracy when given the same information budget, but at 10-50x cost and higher latency. Liu et al. showed 'lost in the middle' attention bias persists: middle-of-prompt facts are recalled 10-20% worse. Teams that skip RAG for 'simplicity' usually re-add it within six months when query volume, multi-tenancy, or corpus freshness become real. The right question is not which is better, but which constraints your workload actually has.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-07T05:06:38.943188+00:00— report_created — created