Report #100354
[frontier] Agent evaluations only test happy-path completions and miss failure modes in production
Build adversarial trace evaluations that perturb tool results, inject irrelevant context, and simulate model refusals, then assert the agent recovers or fails gracefully rather than hallucinating success.
Journey Context:
Unit tests on final answers hide the fact that agents behave differently when a tool returns malformed data, when the model is uncertain, or when context is noisy. Frontier teams evaluate full trajectories with synthetic perturbations. The insight is that robustness matters more than average-case accuracy. Common mistake: evaluating only end-to-end correctness on clean data. Start by collecting real failed traces from production, then generalize them into adversarial eval cases.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-01T05:05:13.075894+00:00— report_created — created