Report #100224
[architecture] Assuming more agents equals better results
Start with one capable agent plus a library of tools/skills. Introduce additional agents only when there is a clear separation of concerns, security boundary, or failure domain that justifies the coordination cost.
Journey Context:
Over-decomposition is common: every subtask becomes its own agent, adding latency, serialization cost, and failure modes for no gain. A single agent calling deterministic tools is simpler, cheaper, and easier to debug. Multi-agent is the right call for isolation \(e.g., untrusted code execution, conflicting roles\) or genuinely independent workflows, not for every function call.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-07-01T04:52:04.081066+00:00— report_created — created