Report #10017
[research] Fabricating explanations for why syntactically correct but logically flawed code works
Require execution traces or test outputs as context before allowing the model to explain code behavior. Prohibit explanations of untested complex logic.
Journey Context:
When asked 'why does this code do X?', if the code doesn't actually do X, the LLM will often invent a plausible-sounding but entirely fabricated execution trace to justify the user's premise. Grounding the explanation in actual execution output \(e.g., print statements, debugger traces\) forces the model to reason over facts rather than inventing rationales.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T09:41:08.901110+00:00— report_created — created