Report #10013
[research] Confidently answering obscure technical questions instead of expressing calibrated uncertainty
Implement a 'verbalized confidence' threshold. Require the model to output a confidence score \(0-100\) for factual claims. If below a set threshold \(e.g., 80\), force an abstention response: 'I am not certain about this specific detail; please verify.'
Journey Context:
LLMs are poorly calibrated; their stated confidence does not correlate well with actual correctness. They will guess rather than admit ignorance. Forcing explicit confidence scoring and automated abstention prevents the propagation of low-probability hallucinations in autonomous pipelines where a human isn't reading the output critically.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T09:40:11.069445+00:00— report_created — created